Hammers v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 10

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JUVENILE CASE RECORDS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/25/16. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 JOSLYNN HAMMERS and DESIRAE HAMMERS, Plaintiffs, 13 16 17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JUVENILE CASE RECORDS vs. 14 15 Case No.: 2:15-cv-01800-KJM-AC COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, JENNIFER RAUZY, SEIHDI KLOH, CYNTHIA MARSHALL, JENNIFER LAMB, KELSEY JOHNSON, MARGO POREMBSKI, COUNTY OF YOLO, DAVID YENNE, BONNIE CHRISTEN, RYAN MEZ, and DOES 1-15 inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 / 20 21 Based upon the Stipulation Regarding Juvenile Case Records, submitted by ECF on 22 January 21, 2016 by counsel for Sacramento County Defendants, on behalf of Defendants, Plaintiffs, and 23 the Yolo County Defendants, the Court, having found GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, does hereby Order 24 as follows: 25 I. JUVENILE CASE FILES 26 Plaintiffs shall produce to Yolo County Defendants any and all documents produced pursuant to 27 the juvenile dependency court’s order: joinder to disclosure of juvenile records after judicial review 28 dated June 5, 2015 within 10 days of the attached (proposed) order. The documents shall be Bates 1 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JUVENILE CASE RECORDS {01500360.DOCX} 1 stamped with the prefix “SACJV.” The Bates stamping will be done by use of conversion of the 2 documents to PDF, and use of Adobe Acrobat’s numbering method. Plaintiffs will also provide a 3 courtesy copy of the documents to Sacramento County Defendants in an effort to maintain uniformity. All parties’ use of the documents is subject to the terms and restrictions described below. 4 5 II. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT’S RECORDS 6 Defendant County of Sacramento shall produce to all other parties all documents in the County 7 of Sacramento Sheriff’s Department’s possession related to this matter within 20 days after service of 8 its initial Rule 26 disclosures. The Bates stamping will be done by use of conversion of the documents 9 to PDF, and use of Adobe Acrobat’s numbering method. The documents shall be Bates stamped with 10 the prefix “SACSD.” All parties’ use of the documents is subject to the terms and restrictions described below. 11 12 III. COUNTY OF YOLO’S SHERIFF DEPARTMENT’S RECORDS 13 Defendant County of Yolo shall produce to all other parties all documents in the 14 County of Yolo Sheriff’s Department’s possession related to this matter within 20 days after service of 15 its initial Rule 26 disclosures. The Bates stamping will be done by use of conversion of the documents 16 to PDF, and use of Adobe Acrobat’s numbering method. The documents shall be Bates stamped with 17 the prefix “YCSD.” The “documents” with regard to County of Yolo should also include dispatch 18 recordings taken the morning of July 19, 2014, when Plaintiff’s minor child was detained and given to 19 a representative of the County of Sacramento’s Child Protective Services. 20 IV. 21 22 METHOD OF PRODUCTION All documents described above that are produced by the parties shall be produced in Adobe Acrobat PDF format on a flash memory stick or CD, as the producing party shall elect. 23 If either party decides to withhold any document that is described above, that party shall 24 produce a privilege log wherein each document withheld is described with sufficient specificity and 25 particularity to allow the parties and/or the Court in this action to discern the time, date, 26 author/recipient, and relationship of the document to the matter, and to a sufficient degree to allow 27 identification of the document in a motion to compel. Further, the privilege log shall identify the 28 factual and/or legal basis for any claim of privilege or confidentiality as to each document withheld 2 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JUVENILE CASE RECORDS {01500360.DOCX} 1 from production pursuant to the attached (proposed) order. The privilege log shall be placed as the 2 very first document in the production of documents produced pursuant to the attached (proposed) order. 3 The documents withheld, in the case of actual documents, shall be replaced in the production 4 where located in the originals with blank pages in an amount of pages equal to the original document 5 being withheld, and bearing the statement “Privilege Claimed” in not less than 12 point font centered in 6 the footer of the page, which are the sequentially Bates stamped as if they were the originals in 7 sequence in the production. That Bates stamp number should be used for identification and stating the 8 basis of the claimed privilege for the document(s) in the privilege log discussed above. Should the item 9 or tangible thing in question be a physical item such as an audio tape, a single page which is also 10 marked “Privilege Claimed” per directions above, with a brief description of the item, and that single 11 page shall be inserted into the production in sequence. If there is a claim of privilege such item(s), that 12 should also be included in the privilege log. 13 V. USE OF DOCUMENTS 14 The documents produced pursuant to the attached (proposed) order shall only be used for the 15 limited purpose of the subject civil litigation. Prior to filing any juvenile records under this (proposed) 16 protective order, the party seeking to file will comply with Local Rule 141. 17 Except as necessary in the civil case, the released documents shall not be disclosed to anyone 18 other than the parties, their counsel (including investigators and adjusters), experts, and if applicable, 19 Defendants’ insurance carrier. Upon conclusion of these proceedings and expiration of all appeal 20 periods, documents produced pursuant to the attached (proposed) order shall be destroyed. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: January 25, 2016 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JUVENILE CASE RECORDS {01500360.DOCX}

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?