Hammers v. County of Sacramento et al
Filing
10
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JUVENILE CASE RECORDS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/25/16. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
JOSLYNN HAMMERS and DESIRAE
HAMMERS,
Plaintiffs,
13
16
17
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING JUVENILE CASE
RECORDS
vs.
14
15
Case No.: 2:15-cv-01800-KJM-AC
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, JENNIFER
RAUZY, SEIHDI KLOH, CYNTHIA
MARSHALL, JENNIFER LAMB, KELSEY
JOHNSON, MARGO POREMBSKI,
COUNTY OF YOLO, DAVID YENNE,
BONNIE CHRISTEN, RYAN MEZ, and
DOES 1-15 inclusive,
18
Defendants.
19
/
20
21
Based upon the Stipulation Regarding Juvenile Case Records, submitted by ECF on
22
January 21, 2016 by counsel for Sacramento County Defendants, on behalf of Defendants, Plaintiffs, and
23
the Yolo County Defendants, the Court, having found GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, does hereby Order
24
as follows:
25
I.
JUVENILE CASE FILES
26
Plaintiffs shall produce to Yolo County Defendants any and all documents produced pursuant to
27
the juvenile dependency court’s order: joinder to disclosure of juvenile records after judicial review
28
dated June 5, 2015 within 10 days of the attached (proposed) order. The documents shall be Bates
1
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JUVENILE CASE RECORDS
{01500360.DOCX}
1
stamped with the prefix “SACJV.” The Bates stamping will be done by use of conversion of the
2
documents to PDF, and use of Adobe Acrobat’s numbering method. Plaintiffs will also provide a
3
courtesy copy of the documents to Sacramento County Defendants in an effort to maintain uniformity.
All parties’ use of the documents is subject to the terms and restrictions described below.
4
5
II.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT’S RECORDS
6
Defendant County of Sacramento shall produce to all other parties all documents in the County
7
of Sacramento Sheriff’s Department’s possession related to this matter within 20 days after service of
8
its initial Rule 26 disclosures. The Bates stamping will be done by use of conversion of the documents
9
to PDF, and use of Adobe Acrobat’s numbering method. The documents shall be Bates stamped with
10
the prefix “SACSD.”
All parties’ use of the documents is subject to the terms and restrictions described below.
11
12
III.
COUNTY OF YOLO’S SHERIFF DEPARTMENT’S RECORDS
13
Defendant County of Yolo shall produce to all other parties all documents in the
14
County of Yolo Sheriff’s Department’s possession related to this matter within 20 days after service of
15
its initial Rule 26 disclosures. The Bates stamping will be done by use of conversion of the documents
16
to PDF, and use of Adobe Acrobat’s numbering method. The documents shall be Bates stamped with
17
the prefix “YCSD.” The “documents” with regard to County of Yolo should also include dispatch
18
recordings taken the morning of July 19, 2014, when Plaintiff’s minor child was detained and given to
19
a representative of the County of Sacramento’s Child Protective Services.
20
IV.
21
22
METHOD OF PRODUCTION
All documents described above that are produced by the parties shall be produced in Adobe
Acrobat PDF format on a flash memory stick or CD, as the producing party shall elect.
23
If either party decides to withhold any document that is described above, that party shall
24
produce a privilege log wherein each document withheld is described with sufficient specificity and
25
particularity to allow the parties and/or the Court in this action to discern the time, date,
26
author/recipient, and relationship of the document to the matter, and to a sufficient degree to allow
27
identification of the document in a motion to compel. Further, the privilege log shall identify the
28
factual and/or legal basis for any claim of privilege or confidentiality as to each document withheld
2
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JUVENILE CASE RECORDS
{01500360.DOCX}
1
from production pursuant to the attached (proposed) order. The privilege log shall be placed as the
2
very first document in the production of documents produced pursuant to the attached (proposed) order.
3
The documents withheld, in the case of actual documents, shall be replaced in the production
4
where located in the originals with blank pages in an amount of pages equal to the original document
5
being withheld, and bearing the statement “Privilege Claimed” in not less than 12 point font centered in
6
the footer of the page, which are the sequentially Bates stamped as if they were the originals in
7
sequence in the production. That Bates stamp number should be used for identification and stating the
8
basis of the claimed privilege for the document(s) in the privilege log discussed above. Should the item
9
or tangible thing in question be a physical item such as an audio tape, a single page which is also
10
marked “Privilege Claimed” per directions above, with a brief description of the item, and that single
11
page shall be inserted into the production in sequence. If there is a claim of privilege such item(s), that
12
should also be included in the privilege log.
13
V.
USE OF DOCUMENTS
14
The documents produced pursuant to the attached (proposed) order shall only be used for the
15
limited purpose of the subject civil litigation. Prior to filing any juvenile records under this (proposed)
16
protective order, the party seeking to file will comply with Local Rule 141.
17
Except as necessary in the civil case, the released documents shall not be disclosed to anyone
18
other than the parties, their counsel (including investigators and adjusters), experts, and if applicable,
19
Defendants’ insurance carrier. Upon conclusion of these proceedings and expiration of all appeal
20
periods, documents produced pursuant to the attached (proposed) order shall be destroyed.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
DATED: January 25, 2016
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JUVENILE CASE RECORDS
{01500360.DOCX}
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?