Blount v. Soto

Filing 70

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/24/19 DENYING 64 , 68 petitioner's motions for an order granting his petition and ordering his release from custody. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REGINALD BLOUNT, 12 No. 2:15-cv-1809 KJM AC P Petitioner, 13 v. 14 J. SOTO, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed a petition for 17 18 a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has moved for entry of default 19 and summary judgment (ECF No. 64) and for injunctive relief in the form of release from prison 20 (ECF No. 68). The motions are, in essence, requests for an order granting the petition for writ of 21 habeas corpus. In his request for default, petitioner argues that his petition should be granted because 22 23 respondent has not answered the petition. ECF No. 64. However, respondent did in fact file an 24 answer (ECF No. 46), to which petitioner responded (ECF No. 50). The request for injunctive 25 relief asks the court to grant the petition and order petitioner’s release based on Ground Four, in 26 which he argues that new evidence exists of his actual innocence. ECF No. 68. The court will 27 rule on the petition in due course and order any relief appropriate at that time. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motions for an order granting 2 his petition and ordering his release from custody (ECF Nos. 64, 68) are DENIED. 3 DATED: September 24, 2019 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?