Blount v. Soto
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/24/19 DENYING 64 , 68 petitioner's motions for an order granting his petition and ordering his release from custody. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
REGINALD BLOUNT,
12
No. 2:15-cv-1809 KJM AC P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
J. SOTO,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed a petition for
17
18
a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has moved for entry of default
19
and summary judgment (ECF No. 64) and for injunctive relief in the form of release from prison
20
(ECF No. 68). The motions are, in essence, requests for an order granting the petition for writ of
21
habeas corpus.
In his request for default, petitioner argues that his petition should be granted because
22
23
respondent has not answered the petition. ECF No. 64. However, respondent did in fact file an
24
answer (ECF No. 46), to which petitioner responded (ECF No. 50). The request for injunctive
25
relief asks the court to grant the petition and order petitioner’s release based on Ground Four, in
26
which he argues that new evidence exists of his actual innocence. ECF No. 68. The court will
27
rule on the petition in due course and order any relief appropriate at that time.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motions for an order granting
2
his petition and ordering his release from custody (ECF Nos. 64, 68) are DENIED.
3
DATED: September 24, 2019
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?