O'Campo v. Golden Bear Restaurant Group Inc., et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/20/17 GRANTING Request for continuance for Dispositive Motions Hearing. The deadline to hear dispositive Motions is EXTENDED from 10/5/17 to 11/16/2017. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
1 SHANE SINGH, SB# 202733
E-Mail: Shane.Singh@lewisbrisbois.com
2 ASHLEY N. ARNETT, SB# 305162
E-Mail: Ashley.Arnett@lewisbrisbois.com
3 2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 700
Sacramento, California 95833
4 Telephone: 916.564.5400
5
Facsimile: 916.564.5444
Attorneys for Defendants, GOLDEN BEAR
6 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. dba ARBY’S,
JOSEPH POLATI, TRUSTEES of the POLATI
7 FAMILY TRUST DATED JULY 29, 2009;
TRACI POLATI, TRUSTEE of the POLATI
8 FAMILY TRUST DATED JULY 29, 2009
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13 DIMAS O’CAMPO,
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01849-TLN-CMK
14
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE FOR
DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
16 GOLDEN BEAR RESTAURANT GROUP,
INC. dba ARBY’S; JOSEPH POLATI,
17 TRUSTESS of the POLATI FAMILY TRUST
The Hon. Troy L. Nunley
Trial Date:
March 12, 2018
DATED JULY 29, 2009; TRACI POLATI,
18 TRUSTEE of the POLATI FAMILY TRUST
19
DATED JULY 29, 2009,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
TO: The Honorable Court,
25
Defendants, Golden Bear Restaurant Group, Inc. dba Arby’s, Joseph Polati, Trustees of the
26 Polati Family Trust dated July 29, 2009, Traci Polati, Trustee of the Polati Family Trust Dated
27 July 29, 2009, and Plaintiff, Dimas O’Campo (collectively “the Parties”), by and through their
LEWI
S
BRISBOI
S
BISGAAR
D
28
4851-6010-9391.1
1
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING
1 respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
2
WHEREAS, the Pretrial Scheduling Order issued on February 1, 2016, indicates that “All
3 dispositive motions . . . shall be heard no later than October 5, 2017. See Docket No. 10.
4
WHEREAS, due to a family medical emergency of Defense counsel, the Parties met and
5 conferred, and mutually agreed, to continue the deadline to hear dispositive motions at least thirty
6 (30) days. Given that the Court only hears civil law and motion on a limited number of days each
7 month, the Parties mutually agreed to continue the date to November 16, 2017.
8
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and hereby request that the Court’s
9 Pretrial Scheduling Order (Docket No. 10) be modified to extend the deadline to hear dispositive
10 motions from October 5, 2017 to November 16, 2017.
11
12
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
13
14
DATED: September 14, 2017
15
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
By:
16
17
18
19
LLP
/s/ Shane Singh, Esq.
Shane Singh, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants, GOLDEN BEAR
RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. dba ARBY’S,
JOSEPH POLATI, TRUSTEES of the POLATI
FAMILY TRUST DATED JULY 29, 2009;
TRACI POLATI, TRUSTEE of the POLATI
FAMILY TRUST DATED JULY 29, 2009
20
21
22
DATED: September 14, 2017
23
DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC
By: /s/ Scottlyn J. Hubbard IV, Esq.
Scottlyn J. Hubbard IV
Stephanie Ross
Attorneys for Plaintiff, DIMAS O’CAMPO
24
25
26
27
LEWI
S
BRISBOI
S
BISGAAR
D
28
4851-6010-9391.1
2
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING
Signature Certification
1
2
I hereby certify that the content of this document is acceptable to Scottlyn J.
3 Hubbard, counsel for Plaintiff, Dimas O’Campo, and that I have obtained Mr.
4 Hubbard’s authorization to affix his electronic signature to this document.
5
6 DATED: September 14, 2017
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
LLP
7
8
By: /s/ Shane Singh
Shane Singh
Attorneys for Defendants, GOLDEN
BEAR RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. dba
ARBY’S, JOSEPH POLATI, TRUSTEES
of the POLATI FAMILY TRUST DATED
JULY 29, 2009; TRACI POLATI,
TRUSTEE of the POLATI FAMILY
TRUST DATED JULY 29, 2009
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19 Dated: September 20, 2017
20
21
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWI
S
BRISBOI
S
BISGAAR
D
28
4851-6010-9391.1
3
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?