Prado v. Swarthout et al

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/30/2017 ADOPTING IN FULL 22 Findings and Recommendations; DISMISSING this action against Defendant J. Jimenez without prejudice. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALEJANDRO PRADO,

12
13

No. 2:15-cv-1866 WBS DB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

14

GARY SWARTHOUT, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On May 23, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

21

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to

23

the findings and recommendations.

24

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27
28

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 23, 2017 (ECF No. 22) are adopted in
full; and
1

1
2

2. This action is dismissed as against defendant Jimenez without prejudice.
Dated: June 30, 2017

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

DLB:9
Prad1866.800

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2