Garcia v. Riaz et al
Filing
22
ORDER adopting in full 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/18. Defendant Bodenhamer's 13 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Bodenhamer is DISMISSED as a defendant to this action, which shall proceed against defendant Riaz ONLY. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT GARCIA,
12
No. 2:15-CV-1869-JAM-CMK-P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
N. RIAZ, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern
19
District of California local rules.
20
On February 22, 201816, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and
21
recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the
22
parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and
23
recommendations have been filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed February 22, 2018, are adopted in
4
2.
Defendant Bodenhamer’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is granted; and
5
3.
Bodenhamer is dismissed as a defendant to this action, which shall proceed
3
6
full;
against defendant Riaz only.
7
8
9
10
DATED: April 11, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez_________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?