Garcia v. Riaz et al

Filing 22

ORDER adopting in full 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/18. Defendant Bodenhamer's 13 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Bodenhamer is DISMISSED as a defendant to this action, which shall proceed against defendant Riaz ONLY. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT GARCIA, 12 No. 2:15-CV-1869-JAM-CMK-P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 N. RIAZ, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 19 District of California local rules. 20 On February 22, 201816, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 21 recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the 22 parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and 23 recommendations have been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 22, 2018, are adopted in 4 2. Defendant Bodenhamer’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is granted; and 5 3. Bodenhamer is dismissed as a defendant to this action, which shall proceed 3 6 full; against defendant Riaz only. 7 8 9 10 DATED:  April 11, 2018              /s/ John A. Mendez_________________              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE  11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?