Garcia v. Riaz et al

Filing 28

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/9/2019 GRANTING 26 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff may file his opposition to 25 Motion for Summary Judgment within 30 days of the date of this order. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT GARCIA, 12 No. 2:15-CV-1869-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 N. RIAZ, ORDER 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s notice (Doc. 26). According to plaintiff, 19 while he served his opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment on defendant, he 20 inadvertently filed his opposition in the wrong court. Plaintiff’s notice is construed as a motion 21 for an extension of time to file his opposition in this court. So construed and good cause 22 appearing therefor, the request is granted. Plaintiff may file his opposition within 30 days of the 23 date of this order. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: January 9, 2019 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?