Garcia v. Riaz et al
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/9/2019 GRANTING 26 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff may file his opposition to 25 Motion for Summary Judgment within 30 days of the date of this order. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT GARCIA,
12
No. 2:15-CV-1869-JAM-DMC-P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
N. RIAZ,
ORDER
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s notice (Doc. 26). According to plaintiff,
19
while he served his opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment on defendant, he
20
inadvertently filed his opposition in the wrong court. Plaintiff’s notice is construed as a motion
21
for an extension of time to file his opposition in this court. So construed and good cause
22
appearing therefor, the request is granted. Plaintiff may file his opposition within 30 days of the
23
date of this order.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: January 9, 2019
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?