Garcia v. Lee et al

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/28/16 ordering The parties shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, inform the courts Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division, in writing, if they believe a settlement confere nce would be beneficial, at the following address, fax number, or email address: ADR Division Attention: Sujean Park U.S. District Court 501 I Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 Fax: (916) 491-3912 Email: spark@caed.uscourts.gov. (cc: ADR Division)(Plummer, M) Modified on 6/28/2016 (Plummer, M).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CARLOS J. GARCIA, 11 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1888 MCE CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BONNIE LEE, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 This pro se prisoner civil rights action proceeds on an Eighth Amendment claim against 18 defendant Hogue. (ECF Nos. 13 & 15.) Defendant has answered the complaint. (ECF No. 29.) 19 As this case has been identified as potentially appropriate for referral to the court’s Alternative 20 Dispute Resolution program, before issuing a pretrial scheduling order the court will explore 21 whether settlement talks before a Magistrate Judge would be beneficial. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The parties shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, inform the court’s 24 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division, in writing, if they believe a settlement conference 25 would be beneficial, at the following address, fax number, or email address: 26 ADR Division 27 Attention: Sujean Park 28 1 1 U.S. District Court 2 501 I Street, Suite 4-200 3 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Fax: (916) 491-3912 5 Email: spark@caed.uscourts.gov 6 Dated: June 28, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2 / garc1888.sett 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?