Ervine v. Davis

Filing 74

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/3/2024 GRANTING 73 Motion for Extension of Time. On or before 5/17/2024, petitioner shall file a response to 72 Motion to Dismiss. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DENNIS NEWTON ERVINE,

12
13
14
15

Petitioner,

No. 2:15-cv-1916 DJC DB
DEATH PENALTY CASE

v.
WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison,

ORDER

Respondent.

16
17

Petitioner is a condemned state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for a

18

writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner seeks an extension of time to file a response to respondent’s

19

motion to dismiss. Petitioner’s counsel states that the motion is extensive and the 14-day

20

response time allowed by the rules is inadequate. Respondent does not oppose the request.

21

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for an

22

extension of time (ECF No. 73) is granted. On or before May 17, 2024, petitioner shall file a

23

response to respondent’s motion to dismiss.

24

Dated: April 3, 2024

25
26
27

DLB:9/DB prisoner inbox/capital/ervine.mtd oppo eot

28
1