Cartagz, Inc. v. Sanders, et al.

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/3/15: The court will not approve 7 Stipulation, but the parties are free to re-submit it, making reference to the correct Local Rules. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CARTAGZ, INC.,

12

No. 2:15-cv-1918 MCE AC
Plaintiff,

13

v.

ORDER

14

GREGORY SANDERS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
The parties have submitted a Stipulated Protective Order. See ECF No. 7. However, the

17
18

stipulation makes reference to “Local Rule 26.1,” which does not exist in this court’s Local

19

Rules. To avoid confusion, the court will not approve the stipulation, but the parties are

20

free to re-submit it, making reference to the correct Local Rules.1

21

DATED: November 3, 2015

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The parties are advised that the link to the court’s Local Rules may be found at
www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/rules/local-rules/.