Cartagz, Inc. v. Sanders, et al.

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/10/2015 ORDERING 19 that Cartagz' response to the Counter-Claim is to be filed not later than 12/22/2015. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP Glenn W. Peterson, Esq. (SBN 126173) 2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 780-8222; Fax No: (916) 780-8775 4 5 6 7 8 9 LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW V. BRADY Matthew V. Brady (SBN 65273) 2339 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 230 Gold River, CA 95670 Telephone: (916) 442-5600; Fax No: (916) 422-5728 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Cartagz, Inc., a California corporation and Counter-Defendants Troy Greeson and Chrizelda Machuca 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) GREGORY SANDERS; KATHY SANDERS; ) EZTAGS, INC., a California corporation; and ) ) DOES 1 through 95, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. _______________________________________) ) GREGORY SANDERS; CATHY SANDERS; ) and CAR REGISTRATION, INC., a California ) ) corporation ) ) Counter-Claimants, ) ) vs. ) ) CARTAGZ, INC., a California corporation; TROY GREESON; CHRIZELDA MACHUCA; ) ) and Roes 1 to 25, inclusive ) ) Counter-Defendants. ) _______________________________________ CARTAGZ, INC., a California corporation, Case No. 2:15-cv-01918-MCE-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COUNTERDEFENDANT TO ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COUNTER-DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM __ 1 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Cartagz, Inc. (“Cartagz”) and Counter-Defendants Troy 3 Greeson and Chrizelda Machuca (hereinafter 4 Defendants/Counter-Claimants Gregory Sanders, Cathy Sanders and Car Registration, Inc. 5 (“Counter-Claimants”), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, present the following 6 Stipulation. 7 8 9 10 11 collectively “Counter-Defendants”) and RECITALS WHEREAS, Counter-Defendant Cartagz was electronically served with the Counter-Claims by Counter-Claimants on October 9, 2015. WHEREAS, on November 3, 2015, the Court granted Cartagz an extension to respond to the Counter-Claim not later than November 6, 2015. 12 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a further extension of time for Cartagz to file a 13 responsive pleading to the Counter-Claim so that the response date coincides with the date the 14 individual Counter-Claimants’ responsive pleading becomes due. 15 WHEREAS, Counsel for Counter-Defendants signed and returned a Waiver of Service of 16 Summons for Troy Greeson and Chizelda Machuca on November 6, 2015 and the parties now 17 respectfully request that the Court grant Cartagz an extension to file a responsive pleading to the 18 Counter-Claim no later than December 22, 2015. 19 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 21 DATED: November 10, 2015 22 23 24 25 MILLSTONE, PETERSON & WATTS, LLP By: /s/ Glenn W. Peterson GLENN W. PETERSON Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Cartagz, Inc., a California corporation and Counter-Defendants Troy Greeson and Chrizelda Machuca 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COUNTER-DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM 1 2 DATED: November 10, 2015 3 By: /s/ Kevin T. Collins KEVIN T. COLLINS (AUTHORIZED ON NOVEMBER 6, 2015) 4 5 Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants Gregory Sanders, Cathy Sanders and Car Registration, Inc. 6 7 8 LECLAIRRYAN I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP /s/ Glenn W. Peterson 9 ORDER 10 11 After full consideration of the above Stipulation, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS 12 HEREBY ORDERED that Cartagz’ response to the Counter-Claim is to be filed not later than 13 December 22, 2015. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 10, 2015 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COUNTER-DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COUNTERCLAIM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?