Cartagz, Inc. v. Sanders, et al.
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/10/2015 ORDERING 19 that Cartagz' response to the Counter-Claim is to be filed not later than 12/22/2015. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
Glenn W. Peterson, Esq. (SBN 126173)
2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210
Roseville, CA 95661
Telephone: (916) 780-8222; Fax No: (916) 780-8775
4
5
6
7
8
9
LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW V. BRADY
Matthew V. Brady (SBN 65273)
2339 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 230
Gold River, CA 95670
Telephone: (916) 442-5600; Fax No: (916) 422-5728
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Cartagz, Inc., a California corporation and
Counter-Defendants Troy Greeson and Chrizelda Machuca
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
GREGORY SANDERS; KATHY SANDERS; )
EZTAGS, INC., a California corporation; and )
)
DOES 1 through 95, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
_______________________________________)
)
GREGORY SANDERS; CATHY SANDERS; )
and CAR REGISTRATION, INC., a California )
)
corporation
)
)
Counter-Claimants,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CARTAGZ, INC., a California corporation;
TROY GREESON; CHRIZELDA MACHUCA; )
)
and Roes 1 to 25, inclusive
)
)
Counter-Defendants.
)
_______________________________________
CARTAGZ, INC., a California corporation,
Case No. 2:15-cv-01918-MCE-AC
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR COUNTERDEFENDANT TO ANSWER
COUNTERCLAIM
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COUNTER-DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
COUNTERCLAIM
__
1
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Cartagz, Inc. (“Cartagz”) and Counter-Defendants Troy
3
Greeson
and
Chrizelda
Machuca
(hereinafter
4
Defendants/Counter-Claimants Gregory Sanders, Cathy Sanders and Car Registration, Inc.
5
(“Counter-Claimants”), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, present the following
6
Stipulation.
7
8
9
10
11
collectively
“Counter-Defendants”)
and
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Counter-Defendant Cartagz was electronically served with the Counter-Claims
by Counter-Claimants on October 9, 2015.
WHEREAS, on November 3, 2015, the Court granted Cartagz an extension to respond to the
Counter-Claim not later than November 6, 2015.
12
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a further extension of time for Cartagz to file a
13
responsive pleading to the Counter-Claim so that the response date coincides with the date the
14
individual Counter-Claimants’ responsive pleading becomes due.
15
WHEREAS, Counsel for Counter-Defendants signed and returned a Waiver of Service of
16
Summons for Troy Greeson and Chizelda Machuca on November 6, 2015 and the parties now
17
respectfully request that the Court grant Cartagz an extension to file a responsive pleading to the
18
Counter-Claim no later than December 22, 2015.
19
20
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
21
DATED: November 10, 2015
22
23
24
25
MILLSTONE, PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
By:
/s/ Glenn W. Peterson
GLENN W. PETERSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
Cartagz, Inc., a California corporation and
Counter-Defendants Troy Greeson and Chrizelda Machuca
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COUNTER-DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
COUNTERCLAIM
1
2
DATED: November 10, 2015
3
By:
/s/ Kevin T. Collins
KEVIN T. COLLINS
(AUTHORIZED ON NOVEMBER 6, 2015)
4
5
Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants
Gregory Sanders, Cathy Sanders and Car Registration, Inc.
6
7
8
LECLAIRRYAN
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed"
signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP /s/ Glenn W. Peterson
9
ORDER
10
11
After full consideration of the above Stipulation, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS
12
HEREBY ORDERED that Cartagz’ response to the Counter-Claim is to be filed not later than
13
December 22, 2015.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 10, 2015
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR COUNTER-DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
COUNTERCLAIM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?