Cartagz, Inc. v. Sanders, et al.

Filing 70

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/30/2016 that the deadline to file the stipulated order concisely setting forth all aspects of the settlement agreement be CONTINUED to 10/10/2016 from 9/26/2016. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 LECLAIRRYAN, LLP Robert S. McWhorter (CA 226186) Kevin T. Collins (CA 185427) Jacqueline N. Vu (CA 287011) 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.246.1140 Facsimile: 916.246.1155 robert.mcwhorter@leclairryan.com kevin.collins@leclairryan.com jacqueline.vu@leclairryan.com Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Claimants, GREGORY SANDERS, CATHY SANDERS, erroneously sued as KATHY SANDERS, and CAR REGISTRATION, INC. erroneously sued as EZTAGS, INC. MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP Glenn W. Peterson (SBN 126173) 2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 780-8222 Facsimile: (916) 780-8775 Attorneys for Counter-Defendants Cartagz, Inc., a California corporation and Troy Greeson and Chrizelda Machuca 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 18 19 20 21 CARTAGZ, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 22 23 24 25 26 v. GREGORY SANDERS; KATHY SANDERS; CALIFORNIA REGISTRATION, INC., a California corporation (formerly EZTAG); CONTINUUM DATA PRODUCTS, a California Corporation, DAWN COOKS and RICHARD COOKS 27 Case No.: 2:15-cv-01918-MCE-GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE A STIPULATED ORDER CONCISELY SETTING FORTH ALL ASPECTS OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 34-2015-00182997) Defendants. 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 2 3 GREGORY SANDERS; CATHY SANDERS; and CAR REGISTRAITON, INC., a California corporation Counter-Claimants, 4 5 6 7 vs. CARTAGZ, INC., a California corporation; TROY GREESON; CHRIZELDA MACHUCA; and Roes 1 to 25, inclusive Counter-Defendants. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 STIPULATION 2 3 4 5 6 7 This stipulation to extend the time to finalize the settlement of this action is entered into by and between defendants and counter-claimants Car Registration, Inc., Gregory Sanders and Cathy Sanders (collectively “Defendants”), on the one hand, and plaintiff and counter-defendants Cartagz, Inc., Troy Greeson and Chrizelda Machuca (collectively “Plaintiffs”), on the other hand, (collectively, the “Parties”) by and through their respective counsel of record with reference to following facts: 8 9 WHEREAS, on August 11, 2016, the Parties met in a settlement conference and resolved to settle the above referenced litigation prior to trial; 10 11 12 WHEREAS, the principal terms of the settlement were set forth on the record, including an agreement to file by August 31, 2016 a stipulated order concisely setting forth all aspects of the settlement agreement; 13 14 WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants took the “laboring oar” in preparing the first draft of the settlement agreement and timely provided it to counsel for Plaintiffs, on August 19, 2016; 15 16 WHEREAS, since August 19, 2016, certain issues and disagreements have arisen that have prevented the Parties from completing the negotiation and drafting of the settlement papers; 17 18 WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs, Matthew Brady, recently had surgery and needed additional time to confer with defense counsel on the drafting of the settlement papers; 19 20 21 WHEARAS, the Parties have successfully resolved many issues relating to the drafting of the settlement papers, but are in need of additional time to negotiate the last few remaining issues relating to the language of the final settlement agreement; 22 23 WHEREAS, the Parties are hopeful and fully anticipate that they will agree upon the language of the final settlement agreement as only a very few issues remain; and 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, the Parties mutually agree that the Court may enter an order upon this stipulation. /// /// 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by and between the Parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the deadline to file the stipulated order concisely setting forth all aspects of the settlement agreement be continued October 10, 2016 from September 26, 2016. Stipulated and agreed to by: Dated: September 26, 2016 LeClairRyan LLP 6 7 By: 8 /s/ Kevin T. Collins Kevin T. Collins Attorneys for Defendants GREGORY SANDERS, CATHY SANDERS, erroneously sued as KATHY SANDERS, and CAR REGISTRATION, INC. erroneously sued as EZTAGS, INC. 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: September 26, 2016 MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP 14 15 By: 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendants CARTAGZ, INC., TROY GREESON and GRIZELDA MACHUCA 17 /s/ Glenn W. Peterson Glenn W. Peterson 18 19 Dated: September 26, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW V. BRADY 20 21 22 23 24 By: /s/ Matthew V. Brady Matthew V. Brady Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendants CARTAGZ, INC., TROY GREESON and GRIZELDA MACHUCA 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ORDER Based on the above stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the parties will file their Proposed Settlement Order no later than October 10, 2011. Should the Proposed Settlement Order not be filed on the above date, the parties shall contact the courtroom clerk of the undersigned and schedule a hearing regarding dispute resolution for the next available date on the calendar of the undersigned. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 11 Dated: September 30, 2016 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?