Sloan v. Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/19/2017 DENYING 25 Motion to exceed the twenty-five page limit. Plaintiff's 26 proposed First Amended Complaint is STRICKEN from the docket. Within 30 days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff may file an amended complaint. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, the court will proceed with screening the original complaint. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHNNY LEE SLOAN, JR.,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:15-cv-01921 MCE AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
AND REHABILITATION, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to exceed the twenty-five page limit for his first
19
amended complaint. ECF No. 25. Included with the motion to exceed the page limit is plaintiff’s
20
signed declaration in support of the motion (id. at 2-3) and proposed amended complaint (ECF
21
No. 26). He seeks leave to exceed the page limit based on a need to address “each level of review
22
of [his] appeals,” with “lengthy verbiage.” ECF No. 25 at 2.
23
The twenty-five page limit only applies to complaints that are filed using the e-filing
24
system. As such, the applicable standard here is a short, plain statement under Rule 8 of the
25
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. However, while there is no page limit outside of e-filing, a
26
complaint exceeding twenty-five pages would be highly disfavored because it would be unlikely
27
to meet the short, plain statement requirement.
28
“The liberal notice pleading of Rule 8(a) is the starting point of a simplified pleading
1
1
system, which was adopted to focus litigation on the merits of a claim.” Swierkiewicz v. Sorema
2
N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 514 (2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. In other words, plaintiff’s claims must be set
3
forth in short and plain terms, simply, concisely, and directly. Plaintiff must eliminate from his
4
pleading all preambles, introductions, argument, speeches, explanations, stories, griping,
5
vouching, evidence, attempts to negate possible defenses, summaries, and the like or face
6
dismissal of the complaint. See McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 1996)
7
(affirming dismissal of § 1983 complaint for violation of Rule 8 after warning); Crawford-El v.
8
Britton, 523 U.S. 574, 597 (1998) (reiterating that “firm application of the Federal Rules of Civil
9
Procedure is fully warranted” in prisoner cases (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).
10
The court (and defendant) should be able to read and understand plaintiff’s pleading within
11
minutes. See McHenry, 84 F.3d at 1177 (pointing out that the form complaint for negligence
12
previously provided in the Federal Rules “can be read in seconds and answered in minutes”). A
13
long, rambling pleading, including many defendants with unexplained, tenuous, or implausible
14
connection to the alleged constitutional injury or joining a series of unrelated claims against many
15
defendants very likely will result in delaying the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and an
16
order dismissing plaintiff’s action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 for violation of
17
these instructions.
18
The proposed amended complaint appears to make a number of claims against numerous
19
individuals at two different prisons. Plaintiff is advised that he may join multiple claims if they
20
are all against a single defendant, Fed. R. Civ. P. 18(a), and joinder of defendants is only
21
permitted if “any right to relief is asserted against them . . . with respect to or arising out of the
22
same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences; and any question of law or
23
fact common to all defendants will arise in the action,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 (emphasis added). In
24
other words, joining more than one claim is only proper when it is against one defendant, and
25
joining multiple defendants in one complaint is only proper when the action is based on the same
26
facts. Additionally, in drafting an amended complaint, plaintiff does not need to walk the court
27
through the facts and circumstances of every grievance. Instead, plaintiff should tell the court
28
whether he has properly exhausted his claims, and if not, briefly explain why. For example, if
2
1
plaintiff claims that the prison refused to accept his appeals, he should plainly state “they refused
2
to accept my appeals.” This type of statement would be appropriate under the short, plain
3
statement standard that is applicable here.
4
Plaintiff has not established a need to file his proposed ninety-page complaint, which does
5
not meet the short, plain statement standard. The circumstances he has alleged do not merit an
6
exception to Rule 8. If plaintiff still wants to file an amended complaint, he is instructed to file an
7
amended complaint that contains a short and plain statement, containing no more than is
8
necessary to briefly explain his claims. If he chooses not to file an amended complaint, the court
9
will proceed with screening the original complaint.
10
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
11
1. The motion for leave to exceed the twenty-five page limit (ECF No. 25) is DENIED.
12
2. Plaintiff’s proposed first amended complaint (ECF No. 26) is stricken from the docket.
13
3. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff may file an amended
14
complaint that complies with this order and with the Rule 8 standard of a short, plain statement.
15
The amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned this case and must be labeled
16
“First Amended Complaint.” Plaintiff must file an original and two copies of the amended
17
complaint. An amended complaint that does not comply with this order may result in a
18
recommendation for dismissal of this action. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, the
19
court will proceed with screening the original complaint.
20
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the prisoner complaint
21
form used in this district.
22
DATED: April 19, 2017
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?