Sloan v. Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/18/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Reconsideration 32 is DENIED. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint that complies with the 9/6/17, order and with the Rule 8 standard of a short, plain statement. The amended complaint must be no longer than twenty-five pages. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHNNY LEE SLOAN, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-1921 MCE AC P v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 On September 6, 2017, the magistrate judge issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s first 18 19 amended complaint with leave to amend. ECF No. 31. Plaintiff has now filed objections to that 20 order. ECF No. 32. When a party objects to a magistrate judge’s order, the order shall be upheld 21 unless it is “clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); L.R. 303(f). Upon 22 review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling 23 was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 32) is DENIED. Within 2 thirty days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff may file an amended complaint that 3 complies with the September 6, 2017, order and with the Rule 8 standard of a short, plain 4 statement. The amended complaint must be no longer than twenty-five pages. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 18, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?