Boyrs v. Paramo

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/20/16: The findings and recommendations 9 , are adopted in full. Petitioner's motions for stay and abeyance 7 , 8 are granted. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT R. BORYS, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1942 WBS AC P v. ORDER DANIEL PARAMO, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 14, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 9. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2015 (ECF No. 9), are adopted 27 28 in full; 1 1 2. Petitioner’s motions for stay and abeyance (ECF Nos.7, 8) are granted; 2 3. Upon receiving the ruling of the California Supreme Court exhausting petitioner’s as- 3 yet unexhausted grounds, petitioner is required, within thirty days thereafter: 4 a. To inform this court of any such ruling and to request the stay be lifted; and 5 b. To file an amended federal petition containing all of his exhausted claims. 6 Dated: January 20, 2016 7 8 9 10 11 Bory1942.800.hc.d 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?