Boyrs v. Paramo
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/20/16: The findings and recommendations 9 , are adopted in full. Petitioner's motions for stay and abeyance 7 , 8 are granted. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT R. BORYS,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-1942 WBS AC P
v.
ORDER
DANIEL PARAMO,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
17
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On December 14, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 9. Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2015 (ECF No. 9), are adopted
27
28
in full;
1
1
2. Petitioner’s motions for stay and abeyance (ECF Nos.7, 8) are granted;
2
3. Upon receiving the ruling of the California Supreme Court exhausting petitioner’s as-
3
yet unexhausted grounds, petitioner is required, within thirty days thereafter:
4
a. To inform this court of any such ruling and to request the stay be lifted; and
5
b. To file an amended federal petition containing all of his exhausted claims.
6
Dated: January 20, 2016
7
8
9
10
11
Bory1942.800.hc.d
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?