G.H. v. United States of America et al

Filing 22

ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/26/16. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:15-CV- 01946 CKD. Any currently scheduled dates presently set before are hereby VACATED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 G.H., by and through his Guardian ad Litem Alejandro Hernandez, 13 14 15 Case No. 2:15-CV-01946 WBS CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a AConsent to Proceed Before a 20 United States Magistrate Judge.@ See 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c). According to E.D. Cal. R. 305, both the 21 district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the 22 magistrate judge. 23 The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case 24 be assigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final 25 judgment. 26 27 28 Page 1 of 2 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable 2 Carolyn K. Delaney. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk of 3 the Court shall bear case number 2:15-CV-01946 CKD. Any currently scheduled dates presently set 4 before Judge Shubb are hereby VACATED. 5 Dated: April 26, 2016 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. Dated: April 26, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?