Bloxton v. White Cap Ready Mix, Inc.

Filing 41

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/09/17 ORDERING that this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each Party to bear their own attorneys'fees and costs. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 WILCOXEN CALLAHAM, LLP DANIEL E. WILCOXEN, SBN 054805 E.S. DEACON, SBN 127638 2114 K Street Sacramento, California 95816 Telephone: (916) 442-2777 Facsimile: (916) 442-4118 Attorneys for Plaintiff WADE BLOXTON 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON Plaintiff, v. Complaint Filed: September 18, 2015 WHITE CAP READY MIX, INC., et al., Trial Date: June 12, 2017 Defendants. 16 17 Case No.: 2:15-CV-01988-KJN WADE BLOXTON, / AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION ____________________________________________________/ 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through 20 their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with 21 prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each Party to bear their own attorneys’ fees and 22 costs. 23 24 DATED: May 9, 2017. WILCOXEN CALLAHAM, LLP 25 26 27 28 By: __/s/ E.S. Deacon______________________ E.S. DEACON Attorneys for Plaintiff WADE BLOXTON {00152276} -1- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON 1 DATED: May 9, 2017 HOLLINGHEAD & ASSOCIATES 2 3 By: 4 5 6 __/s/ Anna J. Neimann__________________ ANNA J. NEIMANN Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Complainant White Cap Ready Mix, Inc. 7 8 DATED: May 24, 2017 CARBONE, SMOKE, ET AL. 9 10 By: 11 12 13 __/s/ Kyle W. Memmott_______________ KYLE W. MEMMOTT Attorneys for Cross-Defendant Leigh Webster 14 15 ORDER 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 9, 2017 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {00152276} -2- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?