Juarez v. Butts et al

Filing 84

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/13/18 DENYING 83 Motion to Appoint Counsel and GRANTING 82 Motion for Extension. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve his objections.(Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOSE JUAREZ, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:15-cv-1996 JAM DB P v. ORDER M. HLAING, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested 16 17 appointment of counsel and an extension of time to file objections to the Findings and 18 Recommendations filed October 26, 2018. Plaintiff contends he requires the appointment of 19 counsel because his disability makes completing legal work difficult. (ECF No. 83.) He further 20 contends that his limited access to the ADA-compliant computer in the library has slowed his 21 ability to meet the court deadline for filing objections to the Findings and Recommendations. 22 (ECF No. 82.) The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require 23 24 counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 25 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the 26 voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 27 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). 28 //// 1 1 The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff’s 2 likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in 3 light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 4 1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Circumstances 5 common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not 6 establish exceptional circumstances that would warrant a request for voluntary assistance of 7 counsel. In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. If 8 plaintiff requires additional time to meet deadlines due to his disability, he may seek extensions 9 of time, as he has done here. 10 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 11 1. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 83) is denied. 12 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 82) is granted; and 13 3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve his 14 15 objections. Dated: November 13, 2018 16 17 18 19 20 DLB:9 DB/prisoner-civil rights/juar1996.31+36obj 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?