Juarez v. Butts et al
Filing
96
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 01/15/19 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 10/26/18 81 as amended by the 12/28/18 order 92 and DISMISSING plaintiff's claims against defendant Monk. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE JUAREZ,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-1996 JAM DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
M. HLAING, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On October 26, 2108, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations. In response, the magistrate judge issued an
24
order, filed December 28, 2018, in which she amended the October 26 findings and
25
recommendations.
26
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
27
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
28
court finds the findings and recommendations, as amended, to be supported by the record and by
1
1
proper analysis.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 26, 2018 (ECF No. 81) are adopted
4
5
as amended by the December 28, 2018 order (ECF No. 92); and
2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Monk are dismissed.
6
7
8
9
DATED: January 15, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?