Juarez v. Butts et al

Filing 96

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 01/15/19 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 10/26/18 81 as amended by the 12/28/18 order 92 and DISMISSING plaintiff's claims against defendant Monk. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE JUAREZ, 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1996 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. HLAING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 26, 2108, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In response, the magistrate judge issued an 24 order, filed December 28, 2018, in which she amended the October 26 findings and 25 recommendations. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 27 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 28 court finds the findings and recommendations, as amended, to be supported by the record and by 1 1 proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 26, 2018 (ECF No. 81) are adopted 4 5 as amended by the December 28, 2018 order (ECF No. 92); and 2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Monk are dismissed. 6 7 8 9 DATED: January 15, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?