Gonzalez v. Veterans Administration et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/27/16 GRANTING Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL E. GONZALEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1997 MCE CKD PS (TEMP) v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA1, et al, 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 17 18 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On May 23, 2016, the undersigned granted permission for partial service 19 of his complaint or leave to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 6.) Plaintiff has elected to file 20 an amended complaint and now requests a thirty-day extension of time to file an amended 21 complaint.2 (Dkt. No. 9.) Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that: 22 1. Plaintiff’s June 21, 2016 request for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 9) is 23 24 granted; and 25 1 26 27 28 Although the caption of plaintiff’s complaint lists the first named defendant as the “VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, a U.S. Government Agency,” the body of plaintiff’s complaint correctly identifies the defendant as the “United States of America.” (Compl. (Dkt. No. 1) at 1.) In this regard, “the United States is the only proper party defendant in an FTCA action[.]” Kennedy v. U.S. Postal Service, 145 F.3d 1077, 1078 (9th Cir. 1998). 2 Accordingly, plaintiff should not attempt to serve any defendant with his original complaint. 1 1 2. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint within thirty days of the date of this 2 order. 3 Dated: June 27, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 BVD\gonzalez1997.eot.ord 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?