Gonzalez v. Veterans Administration et al

Filing 158

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/3/2020 REFERRING this matter back to the District Judge assigned to this action pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). All dates pending before the undersigned are VACATED. The caption on documents filed in this action shall be No. 2:15-cv-1997 MCE DB with the "PS" designation being eliminated. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL E. GONZALEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1997 MCE DB PS v. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Daniel Gonzalez, commenced this action on September 21, 2015, proceeding pro 18 se. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local 19 Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, on February 20, 2020, attorney William 20 Wright appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. (ECF No. 150.) Because plaintiff is no longer proceeding pro se in this action, Local Rule 302(c)(21) no 21 22 longer applies and the case will be referred back to the assigned District Judge. Therefore, all 23 pretrial motions, other than discovery motions, should now be noticed for hearing before the 24 District Judge assigned to this action. The assigned magistrate judge shall continue to perform all 25 duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20). 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action pursuant to 3 Local Rule 302(c)(21); 4 2. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and 5 3. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be 6 7 8 No. 2:15-cv-1997 MCE DB with the “PS” designation being eliminated. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 3, 2020 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?