Gonzalez v. Veterans Administration et al
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/15/18 ORDERING that defendant's 79 Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time is DENIED. The hearing of defendant's 78 Motion to Compel is CONTINUED to 10/26/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Plaintiff's shall file a response on or before 10/19/18 and defendant shall file a reply, in any, to plaintiff's response on or before 10/24/18. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL E. GONZALEZ,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1997 MCE DB PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, Daniel Gonzalez, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 6.) This
18
matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. §
19
636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s amended complaint alleges that medical professionals at the Veterans
20
Administration Hospital, “negligently and inadvertently misdiagnosed and delayed” plaintiff’s
21
medical treatment causing plaintiff harm. (Am. Compl. (ECF No. 11) at 2.)
22
On October 12, 2018, defendant filed a motion to compel the deposition of plaintiff’s
23
expert witness, Dr. Craig Bash. (ECF No. 78.) Defendant has also filed an ex parte application
24
for an order shortening time to hear defendant’s motion on October 19, 2018. (ECF No. 79.)
25
Local Rule 144(e) provides:
26
27
28
Ex parte applications to shorten time will not be granted except upon
affidavit of counsel showing a satisfactory explanation for the need
for the issuance of such an order and for the failure of counsel to
obtain a stipulation for the issuance of such an order from other
counsel or parties in the action.
1
1
Here, defendant argues that the October 19, 2018 hearing on shortened time is necessary
2
because “[i]f this motion were filed on the usual 21-day notice period, (see Local Rule 251), it
3
could not be heard until November 2, the last day of the discovery period.” (ECF No. 79 at 2.)
4
The general 21-day notice period set forth in Local Rule 251(a), however, does not apply to
5
defendant’s motion.
Instead, Local Rule 251(e) provides that “when there has been a complete and total failure
6
7
to respond to a discovery request or order” the “aggrieved party may bring a motion for relief for
8
hearing on fourteen (14) days notice.”1 Here, defendant’s motion argues there was a complete
9
and total failure to respond to a discovery request, i.e., to produce Dr. Bash for deposition.
10
Hearing defendant’s motion on 14 days’ notice would allow for the motion to be heard in
11
compliance with the Local Rules, prior to the close of discovery, permit any further meet and
12
confer, and allow for full briefing from the parties. Moreover, as defendant is aware, the
13
undersigned may modify the discovery deadline in this action if necessary.
14
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
15
1. Defendant’s October 12, 2018 ex parte application to shorten time (ECF No. 79) is
16
denied;
2. The October 19, 2018 hearing of defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 78) is
17
18
continued to Friday, October 26, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I
19
Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned. Any party may
20
appear at the hearing telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete
21
Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than
22
48 hours before the hearing; a party may not appear telephonically over a cellphone;
3. On or before October 19, 2018, plaintiff shall file a response to defendant’s motion to
23
24
compel; and
25
////
26
////
27
28
1
This provision also excepts the parties from the requirement for filing a Joint Statement re
Discovery Disagreement.
2
1
4. On or before October 24, 2018, defendant shall file a reply, if any, to plaintiff’s
2
response.
3
Dated: October 15, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
DLB:6
DB/orders/orders.pro se/gonzalez1997.short.time.den.ord
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?