Hill v. McCrory et al

Filing 5

ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/29/2016 ORDERING Within 14 days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the Clerk of Court $250.00 in monetary sanctions based on plaintiff's failure to appear at th e status conference and failure to comply with court orders. Within 14 days of this order, plaintiff shall also show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b) based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute the case and failure to comply with court orders. Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue the action at this time, she may instead file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i) within 14 days of this order. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CONNIE HILL,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-2017-GEB-KJN PS
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER AND

PAT MCCRORY, et al.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

15
16

Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff Connie Hill, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action on September

19

24, 2015, and paid the filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) That same day, the court issued an “Order Setting

20

Status Conference.” (ECF No. 3.) The order directed plaintiff to “complete service of process on

21

defendants named in the complaint within 120 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is

22

cautioned that this action may be dismissed if service of process is not accomplished within 120

23

days from the date that the complaint is filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).” (Id. at 1.)

24

That same order set a status (pre-trial scheduling) conference for January 28, 2016, at

25

10:00 a.m., and stated that “[a]ll parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without

26

counsel.” (ECF No. 3 at 2.) The order also directed the parties to file a status report addressing

27

specific topics no later than seven (7) days prior to the status conference. (Id. at 2-3.) The order

28

specifically cautioned that “[f]ailing to obey federal or local rules, or [an] order of this court, may
1

1

result in dismissal of this action. This court will construe pro se pleadings liberally, but pro se

2

litigants must comply with the procedural rules.” (Id. at 3.)

3

No status report was filed prior to the status conference, and plaintiff also failed to appear

4

at the status conference as ordered. Additionally, no defendant has yet appeared in this case, and

5

there has been no docket activity by plaintiff since the complaint was filed. Such inactivity

6

strongly suggests that plaintiff has not yet served defendants with process, even though the 120-

7

day period for service of process has now expired.

8

Based on plaintiff’s numerous failures, the court has considered whether the action should

9

be dismissed at this juncture. Nevertheless, in light of plaintiff’s pro se status and the court’s

10

general preference to resolve actions on their merits, the court first attempts lesser sanctions.

11

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

12

1. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the Clerk of Court $250.00

13

in monetary sanctions based on plaintiff’s failure to appear at the status conference

14

and failure to comply with court orders.

15

2. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, plaintiff shall also show cause in writing why

16

this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)

17

based on plaintiff’s failure to prosecute the case and failure to comply with court

18

orders.

19

3. Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue the action at this time, she may

20

instead file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice pursuant to

21

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) within fourteen (14) days of this order.

22

4. Failure to pay the monetary sanctions imposed and file a written response to the order

23

to show cause by the required deadline, OR file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the

24

action by the required deadline, may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice

25

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 29, 2016

28
2