Davis v. Reames, et al

Filing 37

ORDER adopting in full 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/15/18. Defendant Cox is DISMISSED from this action for failure to state a claim. This action shall proceed as against defendants Macias and Reames ONLY. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DESHARN DAVIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-CV-2027-JAM-CMK-P v. ORDER D. REAMES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 19 District of California local rules. On March 16, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been 23 filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 16, 2018, are adopted in 4 2. Defendant Cox is dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim; and 5 3. This action shall proceed as against defendants Macias and Reames only. 3 full; 6 7 8 9 DATED: August 15, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?