Brownfield et al v. Flowers Baking Co. of California, LLC
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/13/2017 MODIFYING the Pretrial Scheduling Order; ORDERING all counsel to disclose expert witnesses by 10/2/2017 and to disclose rebuttal expert witnesses by 10/16/2017; ORDERING that discovery be completed by 11/22/2017; ORDERING that all dispositive motions be filed by 1/12/2018 and that the hearing on such motions be held on 2/13/2018 at 01:30 PM; ORDERING the parties to file a Joint Pretrial Statement by 4/13/2018; CONTINUING the Final Pretrial Conference to 4/20/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; CONTINUING the Jury Trial to 6/18/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
Matthew Mellen (Bar No. 233350)
Sarah Shapero (Bar No. 281748)
MELLEN LAW FIRM
One Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 315-1653
Facsimile:
(415) 276-1902
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
CRAIG BROWNFIELD, an individual, and
on behalf of all others similarly situated; C.A.
BREADMAN, a business entity; CARLOS
GARIBAY, an individual; JIMMY
HERRERA, an individual; MIKE
HERNANDEZ, an individual; NICK
HERNANDEZ, an individual; ANTHONY
TAVAREZ, an individual; SYLVIE
SERRANO, an individual,
16
17
18
19
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-02034-JAM-AC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL AND MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER
Plaintiffs,
v.
FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF
CALIFORNIA, LLC, a limited liability
company; and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
20
Defendants.
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
Judge:
September 28, 2015
September 11, 2017
Hon. John A. Mendez
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-02034-JAM-AC
1
Plaintiffs Craig Brownfield, CA Breadman, Carlos Garibay, Jimmy Herrera, Mike
2
Hernandez, Nick Hernandez, and Anthony Tavarez (collectively, the “Represented Plaintiffs”)1
3
and Defendant Flowers Baking Co. of California, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through their
4
undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully submit the following Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
5
to Continue Trial and Modify Scheduling Order. As outlined below, the parties request that the
6
trial be continued from September 11, 2017 to a date in late June 2018, to permit the parties to
7
coordinate the discovery deadlines in the instant action with Johnson v. Flowers Baking Co. of
8
California, LLC (USDC ED CA Case No. 1:16-cv-00840-JAM), and Porreca, et al. v. Flowers
9
Baking Co. of California, LLC, USDC ED CA Case No. 1:15-cv-00732-DAD (Porreca Dkt. 73).2
10
The Mellen Law Firm is currently representing the Represented Parties in this case, one
11
plaintiff in the related case Johnson case, and 17 individuals and 13 related entities in the Porecca
12
case. Although it is expected that many of the depositions will be relevant to all three cases, the
13
various case deadlines in the three cases are separated by a number of months. In an effort to
14
better coordinate expert disclosures, motion practice, and discovery in the three cases, the parties
15
wish to have one set of discovery deadlines that apply to all three cases.
16
Moreover, although written discovery is underway and a number of depositions have
17
already been taken, the Mellen Law Firm has had some personnel changes and is otherwise facing
18
a number of staffing challenges in connection with the prosecution of the three cases involving 24
19
individual plaintiffs. Two law firms experienced in wage and hour litigation – Keller Grover LLP
20
and Law Offices of Scot D. Bernstein, A Professional Corporation – have agreed to associate in
21
as counsel; however, the two main attorneys from Keller Grover that would be involved in these
22
actions – Eric A. Grover and Robert Spencer – already have a September 11, 2017 Phase II
23
damage trial set in Alameda County Superior Court. In addition, Mr. Grover has a pre-paid
24
family vacation scheduled for August 4-20, 2017. Unless the trial date is continued, Messers.
25
Grover and Spencer will not be available to try this action.
26
27
1
The Mellen Law Firm no longer represents plaintiff Sylvie Serrano. (Dkt. 27.)
The Porreca case involves 17 individual plaintiffs and 13 related entities. Counsel for the
parties herein represent the parties in Porreca.
-1-
2
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-02034-JAM-AC
1
STIPULATION
2
WHEREAS, for the reasons outlined above, the parties request that that the deadlines for
3
disclosing experts, disclosing rebuttal experts, and the discovery cutoff date, all be continued to
4
the same dates for each event in the Porreca case, namely October 2, 2017 (expert disclosure),
5
October 16, 2017 (rebuttal expert disclosure), and November 22, 2017 (discovery cutoff), and that
6
the dispositive motion deadline be continued to January 12, 2018, to avoid a flurry of briefing
7
over the 2017 holidays.
8
9
WHEREAS, for the reasons outlined above, the parties request that the September 11,
2017 trial date be continued to a date on or after June 18, 2018.
10
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree and stipulate to the new deadlines below:
11
Current Deadline:
New Deadline:
12
Expert Disclosures:
February 17, 2017
October 2, 2017
13
Supplemental/Rebuttal Discl:
March 3, 2017
October 16, 2017
14
Discovery Cutoff:
April 3, 2017
November 22, 2017
15
Last Day to File Dispositive Motions:
May 8, 2017
January 12, 2018
16
Hearing date for dispositive motions:
17
Joint Pretrial Statement due:
July 7, 2017
April 13, 2018
18
Final Pretrial Conference:
July 14, 2017 at 11:00
a.m.
April 20, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.
Trial:
September 11, 2017 at
9:00 a.m.
June 18, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.
19
20
February 13, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-02034-JAM-AC
1
Dated: February 13, 2017
MELLEN LAW FIRM
2
3
By
/s/Sarah Shapero
4
MATTHEW MELLEN
SARAH SHAPERO
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
Dated: February 13, 2017
8
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
9
By
10
/s/Brian D. Berry
ROBERT A. JONES
BRIAN D. BERRY
JARTED L. PALMER
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant
FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF CALIFORNIA,
LLC
13
14
15
16
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatories.
17
18
Dated: February 13, 2017
MELLEN LAW FIRM
19
20
21
22
By
/s/Sarah Shapero
MATTHEW MELLEN
SARAH SHAPERO
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-02034-JAM-AC
1
ORDER
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT.
4
5
6
Dated: February 13, 2017
/s/ John A. Mendez_____________
Honorable John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-02034-JAM-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?