Bassett v. Macomber et al

Filing 16

ORDER adopting 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/30/16: Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief 2 is denied. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RICHARD DEWAYNE BASSETT,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-2064-KJM-EFB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

JEFF MACOMBER, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided

19

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On January 14, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which

21

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to

23

the findings and recommendations.

24

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

25

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed

27

the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

28

the proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 14, 2016, are adopted in full; and

3

2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 2) is denied.

4

DATED: March 30, 2016.

5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2