Jackson v. Bick et al
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/7/2018 ADOPTING 51 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 49 motion for injunctive relief. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAYMOND D. JACKSON, Sr.,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2066 WBS DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
J. BICK, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights
18
action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
19
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On April 5, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 51.) Plaintiff has not filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2018 (ECF No. 51), are adopted in
full; and
1
1
2
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 49) is denied.
Dated: May 7, 2018
3
4
5
15cv2066.inj.rel.800
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?