Reid v. Erhart, et al.,
Filing
4
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/21/16 Recommending that this Action be dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address and his failure to com ply with applicable rules and court orders re 1 Complaint filed by Jesse Wayne Reid, Jr. These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to these F&R due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JESSE WAYNE REID JR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:15-cv-2072 MCE KJN PS (TEMP)
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
SAM ERHART, et al,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the
18
undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November
19
6, 2015, the court served upon plaintiff at his address of record an order reassigning this action to
20
the undersigned. (Dkt. No. 3.) The court’s records reflect that on December 3, 2015, plaintiff’s
21
copy of that order was returned to the court by the postal service as undeliverable.
22
It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182, which requires every
23
party, including any party proceeding in propria persona, to notify the court and all other parties
24
of any change of address. Local Rule 182(f). “Absent such notice, service of documents at the
25
prior address of the attorney or pro se party shall be fully effective.” Id. Failure to comply with
26
the court’s rules or with any order of the court may be grounds for imposition by the court of any
27
and all sanctions authorized by statute or rule or within the inherent power of the court. Local
28
Rule 110.
1
1
Good cause appearing, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
2
prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address and his failure
3
to comply with applicable rules and court orders.
4
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
5
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
6
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file and serve written
7
objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to
8
Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff’s failure to file objections within
9
the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal the District Court’s
10
order regarding the findings and recommendations. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.
11
1991).
12
Dated: March 21, 2016
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
reid2072.nca.f&rs.docx
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?