Johnson v. Court of Appeals, Fifth Appellate District
Filing
3
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:15-cv-2082 KJN HC) to Fresno (1:15-cv-1525 JLT HC) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/8/2015. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ERIC JOHNSON,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-2082 KJN P
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL,
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT,
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of
17
18
mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Petitioner has not paid the filing fee or submitted an
19
application to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application for a writ of mandamus, petitioner
20
challenges a ruling issued by the California Court of Appeal for the Fifth Appellate District.
Petitioner is currently incarcerated at California State Prison-Corcoran in Kings County.
21
22
Kings County is located in the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern
23
District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
24
25
division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the
26
court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
3
4
5
California, Fresno Division.
2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number that is assigned and shall
be filed at:
6
7
8
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
Dated: October 8, 2015
9
10
11
12
13
/john2082.109
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?