Diaz v. Hurley et al
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/1/2017 GRANTING 26 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition to 22 Motion to Revoke IFP Status. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2083 GEB KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
ASSOCIATE WARDEN HURLEY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file an opposition to the motion to
revoke IFP status. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
19
1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 26) is granted; and
20
2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition.
21
Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days thereafter.
22
Dated: September 1, 2017
23
24
25
diaz2083.36(2)
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?