Diaz v. Hurley et al

Filing 75

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/10/19 DENYING 74 Motion for a court order directing prison officials to provide him law library access. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2: 15-cv-2083 KJM KJN P v. ORDER ASSOCIATE WARDEN HURLEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s September 30, 2019 motion for a 19 court order directing prison officials to provide him with law library access. (ECF No. 74.) For 20 the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion is denied. On March 27, 2018, this action was dismissed, and judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 47, 21 22 48.) On October 1, 2019, the court denied plaintiff’s motion to vacate the judgment. (ECF No. 23 73.) In the pending motion, plaintiff does not allege why he requires law library access with 24 respect to the instant action. Because this case is closed, and the court denied plaintiff’s motion 25 to vacate the judgment, the undersigned finds that plaintiff has not demonstrated that he requires 26 law library access to prosecute this case. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a court order 2 directing prison officials to provide him with law library access (ECF No. 74) is denied. 3 Dated: October 10, 2019 4 5 6 7 Diaz2083.ord 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?