Diaz v. Hurley et al
Filing
75
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/10/19 DENYING 74 Motion for a court order directing prison officials to provide him law library access. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 15-cv-2083 KJM KJN P
v.
ORDER
ASSOCIATE WARDEN HURLEY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
17
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s September 30, 2019 motion for a
19
court order directing prison officials to provide him with law library access. (ECF No. 74.) For
20
the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion is denied.
On March 27, 2018, this action was dismissed, and judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 47,
21
22
48.) On October 1, 2019, the court denied plaintiff’s motion to vacate the judgment. (ECF No.
23
73.) In the pending motion, plaintiff does not allege why he requires law library access with
24
respect to the instant action. Because this case is closed, and the court denied plaintiff’s motion
25
to vacate the judgment, the undersigned finds that plaintiff has not demonstrated that he requires
26
law library access to prosecute this case.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a court order
2
directing prison officials to provide him with law library access (ECF No. 74) is denied.
3
Dated: October 10, 2019
4
5
6
7
Diaz2083.ord
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?