Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Filing
18
SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/28/17 ORDERING Not later than 5/6/17, any party may designate a supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered b y an expert designated by an adverse party. The right to designate a supplemental expert for rebuttal purposes only shall apply to a party who has not previously disclosed an expert witness on the date set for expert witness disclosure by this Order ; The last day to hear dispositive motions shall be 6/27/17. The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order shall not be modified except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause. This Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order will become final without further order of the Court unless objections are filed within seven (7) days from the date of this Order.(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
MID-CENTURY INSURANCE
COMPANY a/s/o DOUGLAS AND
JOAN BRANIGAN,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
No. 2:15-cv-02089-MCE-AC
v.
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS,
INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING ORDER
Defendants.
17
This action is assigned to the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. Pursuant to the
18
19
provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY
20
ORDERED:
21
I.
DISCOVERY
Pursuant to the Court’s September 7, 2016 Stipulation and Order (ECF No. 17),
22
23
all discovery was completed by February 6, 2017, and expert discovery by March 6,
24
2017.
25
In this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted
26
so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have
27
been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been
28
ordered, the order has been obeyed.
1
1
All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in
2
accordance with the Local Rules.1
3
Not later than May 6, 2017, any party may designate a supplemental list of expert
4
witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an expert designated by
5
an adverse party. The right to designate a supplemental expert for rebuttal purposes
6
only shall apply to a party who has not previously disclosed an expert witness on the
7
date set for expert witness disclosure by this Order.
8
Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all
9
likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An
10
expert witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the
11
party offering the witness demonstrates: (a) good cause for the party’s failure to
12
designate the expert witness in accordance with this Order; (b) that the Court and
13
opposing counsel were promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the
14
witness was promptly made available for deposition.
15
For purposes of this Order, an “expert” is any person who may be used at trial to
16
present evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 702, 703, and 705, which include
17
both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert
18
opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues
19
in the case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a
20
testifying expert for the purposes of litigation).
21
Each party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient, retained, or
22
both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the
23
express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts
24
must state in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such
25
persons.
26
///
27
1
28
A copy of the current Local Rules is available at http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/rules/local-
rules/
2
1
All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render
2
an informed opinion, and given their bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to
3
give full and complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts
4
will not be permitted to testify at the trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or
5
opinion formed, after deposition taken subsequent to designation.
6
Counsel are instructed to complete all discovery of expert witnesses in a timely
7
manner in order to comply with the Court’s deadline for filing dispositive motions.
8
II.
9
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
The last day to hear dispositive motions shall be June 27, 2017. All papers
10
should be filed in conformity with the Local Rules. Absent leave of the Court, all issues
11
the parties wish to resolve on summary judgment must be raised together in one (1)
12
motion or cross-motion. Should the parties wish to file additional motions for summary
13
judgment, they must seek leave of the Court.
14
All purely legal issues are to be resolved in timely pretrial motions. When
15
appropriate, failure to comply with Local Rules 230 and 260, as modified by this Order,
16
may be deemed consent to the motion and the Court may dispose of the motion
17
summarily. With respect to motions for summary judgment, failure to comply with Local
18
Rules 230 and 260, as modified by this Order, may result in dismissal for failure to
19
prosecute (or failure to defend) pursuant to this Court’s inherent authority to control its
20
docket and or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Further, failure to timely oppose a
21
summary judgment motion2 may result in the granting of that motion if the movant shifts
22
the burden to the nonmovant to demonstrate that a genuine issue of material fact
23
remains for trial.
24
The Court places a page limit for points and authorities (exclusive of exhibits and
25
other supporting documentation) of twenty (20) pages on all initial moving papers, twenty
26
(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies.
27
2
28
The Court urges any party that contemplates bringing a motion for summary judgment or who
must oppose a motion for summary judgment to review Local Rule 260.
3
1
Sur-replies are viewed with disfavor and will only be considered upon a showing of good
2
cause. All requests for page limit increases must be made in writing with a proposed
3
order setting forth any and all reasons for any increase in page limit at least seven (7)
4
days prior to the filing of the motion.
5
The parties are directed to the Court’s website for available hearing dates and
6
Judge England’s standard procedures. (www.caed.uscourts.gov – select “Judges” –
7
select “Judge England” – select “Standard Information”).
8
9
Citations to the Supreme Court Lexis database shall include parallel citations to
the Westlaw database.
10
The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device
11
designated to address the admissibility of evidence. The Court will look with disfavor
12
upon dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the
13
guise of motions in limine.
14
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
15
have been tendered to the Court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion
16
cut-off date may constitute waiver of such issue.
17
III.
18
TRIAL SETTING
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness not later than
19
thirty (30) days after receiving this Court’s ruling(s) on the last filed dispositive motion(s).
20
If the parties do not intend to file dispositive motions, the parties are ordered to file a
21
Joint Notice of Trial Readiness not later than thirty (30) days after the close of the
22
designation of supplemental expert witnesses and the notice must include statements of
23
intent to forgo the filing of dispositive motions.
24
The parties are to set forth in their Notice of Trial Readiness, the appropriateness
25
of special procedures, whether this case is related to any other case(s) on file in the
26
Eastern District of California, the prospect for settlement, their estimated trial length, any
27
request for a jury, and their availability for trial.
28
///
4
1
The parties’ Notice of Trial Readiness Statement shall also estimate how many court
2
days each party will require to present its case, including opening statements and
3
closing arguments. Plaintiff’s estimate shall also include the time necessary for jury
4
selection, and Defendant’s estimate shall include the time necessary to finalize jury
5
instructions and instruct the jury.
6
This Court is in session for jury selection, opening statements, presentation of
7
evidence, closing arguments, finalizing proposed jury instructions and verdict forms, and
8
instruction of the jury Monday through Wednesday, only. During trial days, the Court
9
adheres to the following schedule:
10
Trial: 9:00—10:30 A.M.
11
Break: 10:30—10:50 A.M.
12
Trial: 10:50—12:00 P.M.
13
Lunch: 12:00—1:30 P.M.
14
Trial: 1:30—3:00 P.M.
15
Break: 3:00—3:20 P.M.
16
Trial: 3:20—4:30 P.M.
17
Jury deliberations only are Monday through Friday if necessary.
18
After review of the parties’ Joint Notice of Trial Readiness, the Court will issue an
19
order that sets forth dates for a final pretrial conference and trial.
20
IV.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
21
If the parties agree to a settlement conference, a magistrate judge will be
22
randomly assigned to the case to preside over the settlement conference. If the parties
23
specifically request that the assigned District Judge or Magistrate Judge conduct the
24
settlement conference, the parties shall file the appropriate waiver of disqualification in
25
accordance with Local Rule 270(b).
26
If the parties elect to participate in the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (VDRP), a
27
stipulation of election is required pursuant to Local Rule 271. See, Attachments 2-1 and
28
2-2 of this Order.
5
1
In accordance with Local Rule 160, counsel are to immediately file a notice of
2
settlement or other disposition of this case.
3
V.
4
MODIFICATION OF INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
5
Procedure, the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order shall not be modified except by leave of
6
court upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation
7
alone to modify the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order does not constitute good cause.
8
Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel will not
9
constitute good cause.
10
VI.
11
COURTESY COPIES
No party shall submit paper courtesy copies of pleadings or exhibits to the Court
12
unless expressly ordered to do so.
13
VII.
14
OBJECTIONS TO INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
This Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order will become final without further order of the
15
Court unless objections are filed within seven (7) days from the date of this Order.
16
Dated: April 28, 2017
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?