Cole v. Guillen et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/20/2015 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ODDIS VERMONT COLE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-2095 KJN P v. ORDER F. GUILLEN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff consented to proceed before the 17 18 undersigned (ECF No. 1 at 4) for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Plaintiff’s four page 19 complaint was signed on July 15, 2015, and filed in the Northern District of California on July 27, 20 2015. The court’s own records reveal that on June 17, 2015, plaintiff signed a four page 21 complaint, filed in the Northern District on June 29, 2015, containing virtually identical 22 allegations. (Case No. 2:15-cv-1613 GEB DAD).1 Both cases were subsequently transferred to 23 the Eastern District. Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, the court will dismiss the 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 28 1 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980). 1 1 complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without 2 prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 Dated: October 20, 2015 4 5 /cole2095.23 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?