Wilson v. Fox et al.

Filing 28

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/31/2017 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiff's 18 Motion for a protective order is DENIED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID W. WILSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-02108 MCE DB P

v.

ORDER

ROBERT W. FOX, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 12, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the

23

findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

26

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 12, 2017, are adopted in full; and

3

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order (ECF No. 18) is denied.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated: July 31, 2017

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2