Patterson v. Wong Do et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/13/2018 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations in full; Plaintiff's IFP status is REVOKED. Plaintiff shall pay the entire $400.00 in required fees within 30 days of service of this order or face dismissal of the case. (Fabillaran, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VESTER L. PATTERSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:15-cv-2117 MCE AC P ORDER SAM WONG DO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 13, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 13. After 23 receiving two extensions of time (ECF Nos. 15, 17), plaintiff filed timely objections to the 24 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 18). 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 28 analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 13, 2017 (ECF No. 13), are 3 adopted in full; 4 2. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is revoked. 5 3. Plaintiff shall pay the entire $400.00 in required fees within thirty days of service of 6 this order or face dismissal of the case. 7 8 Dated: March 13, 2018 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?