Griffith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/24/15: Wells Fargo's counsel are hereby ORDERED, within seven (7) days of entry of this order, to show cause why they should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for their failure to comply with this court's order. Alternatively, Wells Fargo's counsel are ORDERED to meet and confer with plaintiff's counsel prior to the due date of the opposition to Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss. Additionally, Wells Fargo's counsel should file a notice certifying the meet and confer. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIFFANY GRIFFITH, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-cv-02123-KJM-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; NBS DEFAULT SERVICES, LLC; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendant. 17 18 19 On October 13, 2015, the court issued a standing order. ECF No. 2-2. In the 20 order, the parties were directed to engage in a meet and confer prior to filing a motion. Id. at 3. 21 The meet and confer directive was designed to have the parties discuss thoroughly the substance 22 of the contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Id. After meeting and conferring, if a 23 party still desired to file a motion, that party was directed to file a notice of motion containing “a 24 certification by counsel filing the motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a 25 brief summary of meet and confer efforts.” Id. 26 On October 19, 2015, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) filed a 27 motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. ECF No. 5. On October 21, 2015, Wells Fargo filed a 28 notice of hearing date regarding the motion to dismiss. ECF No. 7. Wells Fargo’s counsel failed 1 1 to file a notice of motion containing a certification indicating meet and confer efforts have been 2 exhausted in either notice, and thus did not comply with the court’s standing order. 3 Accordingly, Wells Fargo’s counsel are hereby ORDERED, within seven (7) days 4 of entry of this order, to show cause why they should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for 5 their failure to comply with this court’s order. Alternatively, Wells Fargo’s counsel are 6 ORDERED to meet and confer with plaintiff’s counsel prior to the due date of the opposition to 7 Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss. Additionally, Wells Fargo’s counsel should file a notice 8 certifying the meet and confer, with a report on any narrowing of issues resulting from the meet 9 and confer. If the parties meet and confer, the possibility of a sanction will be abated. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 24, 2015. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?