Jackson v. Foster et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/29/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's request that this case be re-opened (ECF No. 12 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-open this case and serve plaintiff with a copy of the courts November 2, 2015 order (ECF No. 8 ). Plaintiff is granted 30 days within which to comply with that order. If plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within thirty days, this case will be dismissed.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES A. JACKSON, JR., 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-2145 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOHN FOSTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 11, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion asking that this case be re-opened. Plaintiff 18 asserts he never received the court’s November 2, 2015 order dismissing plaintiff’s original 19 complaint with leave to amend. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. Plaintiff’s request that this case be re-opened (ECF No. 12) is granted. 21 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-open this case and serve plaintiff with a copy of 22 23 the court’s November 2, 2015 order (ECF No. 8). 3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days within which to comply with that order. If plaintiff fails 24 to file an amended complaint within thirty days, this case will be dismissed. 25 Dated: February 29, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1/jack2145.reo

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?