Shockley v. Young
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/2016 DISMISSING this action, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
IVAN SHOCKLEY,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2157 KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
OSCAR YOUNG,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff is proceeding, without counsel, with this civil rights action. Plaintiff consented to
the jurisdiction of the undersigned. (ECF No. 6.)
19
A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal
20
service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that
21
a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-
22
three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has
23
failed to notify the Court of a current address.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice
25
for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).
26
Dated: March 31, 2016
27
28
Shock2157.dis
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?