Shockley v. Young

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/2016 DISMISSING this action, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IVAN SHOCKLEY, 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-2157 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER OSCAR YOUNG, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding, without counsel, with this civil rights action. Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. (ECF No. 6.) 19 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 20 service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that 21 a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty- 22 three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has 23 failed to notify the Court of a current address. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice 25 for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 26 Dated: March 31, 2016 27 28 Shock2157.dis 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?