Jackson v. Delgado, et al.

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/28/16 denying 10 , 13 Motions to Proceed IFP. This case remains closed. (cc: USCA, 9th circuit) (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS RENEE JACKSON, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-2158 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER TIMOTHY HOWARD DELGADO, et al., Defendant. 16 17 This action was dismissed by order and judgment filed April 11, 2016. See ECF Nos. 6, 18 7. Thereafter plaintiff filed a notice of appeal and two motions to proceed in forma pauperis. See 19 ECF Nos. 8, 10, 13. Plaintiff’s appeal has been accorded a case number in the Court of Appeals 20 and plaintiff is there actively pursuing independent requests to proceed in forma pauperis. See 21 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket, Case No. 16-16979. Therefore, plaintiff’s requests to 22 proceed in forma pauperis in this court will be denied. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s post-judgment motions to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF Nos. 10 and 13, are DENIED. This case remains closed. SO ORDERED. DATED: December 28, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?