Jackson v. Delgado, et al.

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/28/16 denying 10 , 13 Motions to Proceed IFP. This case remains closed. (cc: USCA, 9th circuit) (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CURTIS RENEE JACKSON,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-2158 AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

TIMOTHY HOWARD DELGADO, et al.,
Defendant.

16
17

This action was dismissed by order and judgment filed April 11, 2016. See ECF Nos. 6,

18

7. Thereafter plaintiff filed a notice of appeal and two motions to proceed in forma pauperis. See

19

ECF Nos. 8, 10, 13. Plaintiff’s appeal has been accorded a case number in the Court of Appeals

20

and plaintiff is there actively pursuing independent requests to proceed in forma pauperis. See

21

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket, Case No. 16-16979. Therefore, plaintiff’s requests to

22

proceed in forma pauperis in this court will be denied.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s post-judgment motions to
proceed in forma pauperis, ECF Nos. 10 and 13, are DENIED. This case remains closed.
SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 28, 2016