Wake Forest Acquisitions, L.P., et al., v. Vanderbilt Commercial Lending, Inc. et al
Filing
35
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/27/17 ORDERING that the ADR completion deadline is EXTENDED through and including 3/17/2017 to allow the parties to complete the ADR process. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Maria S. Bellafronto (State Bar No. 161994)
mbellafronto@hopkinscarley.com
Monique D. Jewett-Brewster (State Bar No. 217792)
mjb@hopkinscarley.com
HOPKINS & CARLEY
A Law Corporation
The Letitia Building
70 S First Street
San Jose, CA 95113-2406
mailing address:
P.O. Box 1469
San Jose, CA 95109-1469
Telephone:
(408) 286-9800
Facsimile:
(408) 998-4790
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendant
WAKE FOREST ACQUISITIONS, L.P. c/o
Corporation Service Company; SHAFFER ASSET
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION c/o Corporation
Service Company; ROBERT P. SHAFFER,
individually and as Co-Trustee of the Robert P.
Shaffer Revocable Trust; and MARY SHAFFER, as
Co-Trustee of the Robert P. Shaffer Revocable Trust
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
WAKE FOREST ACQUISITIONS, L.P.;
SHAFFER ASSET MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION; ROBERT P. SHAFFER,
individually and as Co-Trustee of the
Robert P. Shaffer Revocable Trust; and
MARY SHAFFER, as Co-Trustee of the
Robert P. Shaffer Revocable Trust,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND VDRP DEADLINE
Judge:
Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
Plaintiffs,
21
22
v.
23
VANDERBILT COMMERCIAL
LENDING, INC.; and GREGORY COOK,
24
25
26
Defendants.
VANDERBILT COMMERCIAL
LENDING, INC.
Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN JOSE
CASE NO: 2:15-CV-02167-KJM-AC
v.
436\1431505.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE
2:15-CV-02167-KJM-AC
1
WAKE FOREST ACQUISITIONS, L.P.,
2
CounterclaimDefendant.
3
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2016, the NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT from VDRP
4
5
Administrator appointing William Robinson, of Best Best & Krieger LLP, as VDRP Neutral
6
Attorney pursuant to Local Rule 271 (e)(1) was entered on the Docket (Dkt. No. 33);
WHEREAS, Local Rule 271 (e)(1) requires the parties to complete the proposed ADR
7
8
with 91 days after the Neutral is selected, which makes January 27, 2017 the deadline for the
9
parties completing their VDRP session in this case;
WHEREAS, having not heard from the Neutral whatsoever, on January 10, 2017, counsel
10
11
for Plaintiffs contacted Mr. Robinson;
WHEREAS, Mr. Robinson wrote to all parties to this litigation on January 13, 2017,
12
13
setting a preliminary telephone conference for January 31, 2017 at 11:00 a.m.; and
WHEREAS, at that time, Mr. Robinson proposed several mediation session dates in
14
15
February and March 2017.
16
THEREFORE, since the parties will not be able to complete the mediation within the
17
required 91 day timeframe, the parties hereby agree and stipulate that, subject to the Court’s
18
approval, that the ADR completion deadline be extended through and including March 17, 2017
19
to allow the parties to complete the ADR process.
20
Dated: January 24, 2017
HOPKINS & CARLEY
A Law Corporation
21
22
By: /s/ Monique D. Jewett-Brewster
Maria S. Bellafronto
Monique D. Jewett-Brewster
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CounterDefendant
23
24
25
26
///
27
///
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN JOSE
436\1431505.1
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE
2:15-CV-02167-KJM-AC
1
Dated: January 24, 2017
BOUTIN JONES INC.
2
3
By: /s/ Kelley M. Lincoln
Robert D. Swanson, Esq.
Kelley M. Lincoln, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant Gregory Cook
and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff
VANDERBILT COMMERCIAL
LENDING, INC.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 27, 2017
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN JOSE
436\1431505.1
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE
2:15-CV-02167-KJM-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?