King v. People of the State of California
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/2/2017 ORDERING, within 30 days, petitioner shall file a second amended petition in compliance with the court's 3/16/2017 order.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEONARD MICHAEL KING,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2174 DB P
v.
ORDER
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a
17
18
writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In an order filed March 16, 2017, the court
19
dismissed petitioner’s first amended petition and gave petitioner thirty days to file a second
20
amended petition. Those thirty days have passed and petitioner has not filed a second amended
21
petition or otherwise responded to the court’s March 16 order.
Petitioner was advised in the March 16 order that his failure to file a timely second
22
23
amended petition in compliance with the March 16 order may result in dismissal of this action.
24
Petitioner will be given one additional opportunity to file a second amended petition.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order,
25
26
petitioner shall file a second amended petition in compliance with the court’s March 16 order.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Petitioner’s is warned that his failure to file a timely second amended petition will result in
2
dismissal of this action.
3
DATED: May 2, 2017
4
5
/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-habeas/king2174.fta
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?