King v. People of the State of California
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/8/2017 GRANTING 20 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner to file second amended petition in compliance with the court's 3/16/2017 order within 30 days of the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEONARD MICHAEL KING,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2174 DB P
v.
ORDER
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a
17
18
writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In an order filed March 16, 2017, the court
19
dismissed petitioner’s first amended petition and gave petitioner thirty days to file a second
20
amended petition. In an order filed May 2, 2017, the court warned petitioner that his case would
21
be dismissed if he did not file a second amended petition within another thirty days.
On June 2, 2017, petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file a second
22
23
amended petition.
24
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an
25
extension of time (ECF No. 20) is granted. Within thirty days of the date of this order, petitioner
26
shall file a second amended petition in compliance with the court’s March 16 order. Petitioner is
27
////
28
////
1
1
again warned that his failure to file a timely second amended petition will result in dismissal of
2
this action.
3
DATED: June 8, 2017
4
5
/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-habeas/king2174.SAP eot
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?