Huffman et al v. Comcast Corporation et al
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's Jason Shelton and John Schmitt, Jr. with Prejudice signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/12/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEVIN HUFFMAN, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
No. 2:15-cv-02186-DAD-SKO
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, a
Pennsylvania corporation; COMCAST OF
CONTRA COSTA, INC., a Washington
corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
17
PLAINTIFFS JASON SHELTON AND JOHN
SCHMITT, JR. HAVE BEEN DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE
(Doc. No. 22)
Defendants.
18
19
On June 9, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing plaintiffs Jason Shelton and John
20
Schmitt, Jr. from this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and
21
attorneys’ fees. (Doc. No. 22.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, Jason Shelton and John
22
Schmitt, Jr. have been dismissed from this action with prejudice and without an award of
23
attorneys’ fees and costs to either party. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San
24
Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate plaintiffs
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Jason Shelton and John Schmitt, Jr. from this action. This dismissal does not affect the
2
status of the other plaintiffs in the action.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated:
June 12, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?