Huffman et al v. Comcast Corporation et al

Filing 23

ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's Jason Shelton and John Schmitt, Jr. with Prejudice signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/12/2016. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN HUFFMAN, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-cv-02186-DAD-SKO v. COMCAST CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation; COMCAST OF CONTRA COSTA, INC., a Washington corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 PLAINTIFFS JASON SHELTON AND JOHN SCHMITT, JR. HAVE BEEN DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. No. 22) Defendants. 18 19 On June 9, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing plaintiffs Jason Shelton and John 20 Schmitt, Jr. from this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and 21 attorneys’ fees. (Doc. No. 22.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, Jason Shelton and John 22 Schmitt, Jr. have been dismissed from this action with prejudice and without an award of 23 attorneys’ fees and costs to either party. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San 24 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate plaintiffs 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Jason Shelton and John Schmitt, Jr. from this action. This dismissal does not affect the 2 status of the other plaintiffs in the action. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: June 12, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?