Cuaresma, Jr. v. Farmers Group Disability Income Plan, an ERISA Plan et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/5/2016 ORDERING the defendants to file their Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/19/2016; ORDERING the plaintiff to file an opposition to the 12 Motion for Summary Judgment by 8/9/2016; ORDERING that any reply be filed by 8/23/2016; CONFIRMING the hearing on 12 Motion for Summary Judgment SET for 9/6/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6

A Professional Corporation
Redwood City

Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley

7
8
9
10

PAMELA E. COGAN (SBN 105089)
ROBERT M. FORNI, JR. (SBN 180841)
ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY
1001 Marshall Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063-2052
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
FARMERS GROUP DISABILITY INCOME PLAN, and
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
LAURENCE F. PADWAY, #89314
LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY
1516 Oak Street, Suite 109
Alameda, California 94501
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile : [phone]

11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff
NARCISIO CUARESMA, JR.

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17

NARCISIO CUARESMA, JR.,
Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21

v.
FARMERS GROUP DISABILITY INCOME
PLAN, an ERISA Plan, and LIBERTY LIFE
ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON,

Case No. 2:15-CV-02192-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING
DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Complaint served: October 27, 2015

Defendants.

22
23
24

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff NARCISIO CUARESMA, JR.,

25

and defendants FARMERS GROUP DISABILITY INCOME PLAN, and LIBERTY LIFE

26

ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON (“Defendants”), by and through their respective

27

attorneys of record, that the following briefing and hearing schedule for Defendants’ Motion for

28
4821-3641-5540.1

STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:P15-CV-02191

1

Summary Judgment on Their Sixth Affirmative Defense for Failure to Exhaust Administrative

2

Remedies be adopted:

3

July 19, 2016:

4
5

motion for summary judgment
August 9, 2016:

6

A Professional Corporation
Redwood City

Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley

7

10

Plaintiff’s last day to file his opposition to Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment

August 23, 2016:

8
9

Defendants’ last day to file their moving papers in support of their

Defendants’ last day to file their reply papers in support of their
motion for summary judgment

September 6, 2016:

Hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment

All signatories to this Stipulation, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in

11

the Stipulation’s content and have authorized its filing.

12

Dated: July 13, 2016

LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY

13
14

By: /s/ Laurence F. Padway
LAURENCE F. PADWAY
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
NARCISIO CUARESMA, JR.

15
16
17

Dated: July 13, 2016

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

18
19

By:/s/ Robert M. Forni, Jr.
PAMELA E. COGAN
ROBERT M. FORNI, JR.
Attorneys for Defendants,
FARMERS GROUP DISABILITY
INCOME PLAN, and LIBERTY LIFE
ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON

20
21
22
23
24

ORDER

25
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the following briefing and hearing schedule on

26
27

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby adopted:

28
4821-3641-5540.1

-2-

STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:P15-CV-02191

1

July 19, 2016:

2
3

motion for summary judgment
August 9, 2016:

4
5

Defendants’ last day to file their moving papers in support of their

Plaintiff's last day to file his opposition to Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment

August 23, 2016:

6

Defendants’ last day to file their reply papers in support of their
motion for summary judgment

A Professional Corporation
Redwood City

Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley

7

September 6, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.:

8

judgment

9
10

Hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/5/2016

/s/ John A. Mendez_____________

11

Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4821-3641-5540.1

-3-

STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:P15-CV-02191