Smith v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department
Filing
7
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/7/2016 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this case. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STACHA SMITH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-2239-EFB P
v.
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On September 11, 2015, the court found that plaintiff had failed to include a
19
certified copy of her trust account statement in support of her application to proceed in forma
20
pauperis, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, the court ordered plaintiff to
21
submit a certified copy of the statement within thirty days and warned her that failure to do so
22
may result in this action being dismissed. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not
23
paid submitted a certified copy of her trust account statement or otherwise responded to the
24
court’s order.1
25
/////
26
1
27
28
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff
was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of her current
address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of
the party is fully effective.
1
1
2
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a United States
District Judge to this case.
3
Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
4
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
5
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
6
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
7
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
8
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
9
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
10
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
11
appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez
12
v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
13
DATED: January 7, 2016.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?