Markus v. Aerojet RocketDyne Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/27/18 ORDERING that the deadline for Defendants to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is EXTENDED by sixty (60) calendar days, through and including 9/28/2018.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
BRIAN MARKUS, individually,
Plaintiff,
vs.
AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS,
INC., a corporation and AEROJET
ROCKETDYNE, INC., a corporation,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:15-cv-02245-WBS-AC
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO FURTHER
EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS AEROJET
ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC.
AND AEROJET ROCKETDYNE,
INC. TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants Served:
June 11, 2018
Current Response Date: July 30, 2018
New Response Date: Sept. 28, 2018

23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

1

This matter comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation to Further Extend

2

Time for Defendants Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. and Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc.

3

(hereinafter, “Defendants”) to Answer or Otherwise Respond to First Amended

4

Complaint (the “Joint Stipulation”). The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation and,

5

good cause appearing, GRANTS the Joint Stipulation.

6

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to move, answer

7

or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is extended by sixty (60) calendar

8

days, through and including September 28, 2018.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12

Dated: July 27, 2018

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT