Markus v. Aerojet RocketDyne Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/11/19 GRANTING 45 Stipulation to Extend Time, EXTENDING time to Respond to 42 Second Amended Complaint to 2/22/19. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. BRIAN MARKUS, individually, Plaintiff, vs. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC., a corporation and AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC., a corporation, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-02245-WBS-AC ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. AND AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SAC Served: Jan. 4, 2019 Current Response Date: Jan. 18, 2019 New Response Date: Feb. 22, 2019 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 The Court, having reviewed and considered the Relator and Defendants’ 2 Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. and Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. (hereinafter, 3 “Defendants”) Stipulation to Further Extend Time to Respond to Second Amended 4 Complaint (the “Stipulation”), and good cause appearing thereon, hereby grants the 5 Stipulation to extend through and including February 22, 2019 Defendants’ time to 6 move, answer or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: January 11, 2019 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?