Hebert v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/30/2016 AWARDING the plaintiff attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of $4,650.00. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Forslund Law, LLC CSBN 154575 P.O. Box 4476 Sunriver, OR 97707 Telephone: 541-419-0074 Fax: 541-593-4452 Email: jaf@forslundlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 SUSAN J. HEBERT, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) Acting Comm’r of Social Security, ) ) Defendant ) ) ____________________________________) Case No. 2:15-CV-2261-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, 18 subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal 19 Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND SIX 20 HUNDRED AND FIFTY dollars ($4,650.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal 21 services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d). 22 After the Court issues an order for payment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the 23 government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to 24 Plaintiff’s attorney. 25 fees and expenses are subject to an offset allowed under the United States Department of the 26 Treasury’s Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). After the order of 27 EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine if they are subject to an offset. If 28 it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees and expenses are not subject to an offset under Astrue v. Hebert v. Colvin The government’s ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the Stipulation and Proposed Order E.D. Cal. 2:15-cv-02261-CMK 1 Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and the Department of Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for 2 EAJA fees and expenses shall be made payable to Jacqueline A. Forslund, based upon Plaintiff’s 3 assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. The parties agree that whether these checks are 4 made payable to Plaintiff or Jacqueline A. Forslund, such checks shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney at the following address: Jacqueline A. Forslund, P.O. Box 4476, Sunriver, Oregon 97707. 5 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney 6 fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or 7 otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any 8 and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s Counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in 9 connection with this action. 10 Respectfully submitted, 11 Date: November 28, 2016 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorney at Law /s/Jacqueline A. Forslund JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorney for Plaintiff Date: November 29, 2016 12 PHILIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 /s/Asim H. Modi ASIM H. MODI Special Assistant United States Attorney *By email authorization Attorney for Defendant 20 21 22 23 ORDER 24 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED 25 26 Dated: November 30, 2016 27 28 Hebert v. Colvin Stipulation and Proposed Order E.D. Cal. 2:15-cv-02261-CMK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?