Hammler v. Haas, et al.
Filing
157
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/21/2022 VACATING 142 , 143 , 144 , 147 , 148 and 149 Writs of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum, for inmates Robert Santoro (CDCR # T-40346), Dannell Richard (CDCR # K-00572), Kenneth Patterson (CDCR #AB-6602), Cedrick Johnson (CDCR # G-41474), Allen Hammler (CDCR # F-73072), and Larry Alford (CDCR # AU-8727). New appearance writs for plaintiff and all inmate witnesses will be reissued closer to the new 3/6/2023, trial date. (cc: OTCD)(Huang, H)
Case 2:15-cv-02266-DAD-AC Document 157 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALLEN HAMMLER,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2266 DAD AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
HAAS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. The case was set for trial on January 9, 2023, before the district judge. See ECF
19
No. 128. However, on December 20, 2022, the trial date was reset to March 6, 2023. See ECF
20
No. 156. All appearance writs issued for the January 2023 trial date must therefore be vacated.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following writs of habeas corpus ad
22
testificandum recently issued for plaintiff and the following inmate witnesses are VACATED:
23
Robert Santoro, CDCR # T-40346 (ECF No. 142);
24
Dannell Richard, CDCR # K-00572 (ECF No. 143);
25
Kenneth Patterson, CDCR #AB-6602 (ECF No. 144);
26
Cedrick Johnson, CDCR # G-41474 (ECF No. 147);
27
Allen Hammler, CDCR # F-73072 (ECF No. 148), and
28
Larry Alford, CDCR # AU-8727 (ECF No. 149).
1
Case 2:15-cv-02266-DAD-AC Document 157 Filed 12/21/22 Page 2 of 2
1
New appearance writs for plaintiff and all inmate witnesses will be reissued closer to the
2
new March 6, 2023, trial date.
3
DATED: December 21, 2022
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?