Hammler v. Haas, et al.

Filing 157

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/21/2022 VACATING 142 , 143 , 144 , 147 , 148 and 149 Writs of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum, for inmates Robert Santoro (CDCR # T-40346), Dannell Richard (CDCR # K-00572), Kenneth Patterson (CDCR #AB-6602), Cedrick Johnson (CDCR # G-41474), Allen Hammler (CDCR # F-73072), and Larry Alford (CDCR # AU-8727). New appearance writs for plaintiff and all inmate witnesses will be reissued closer to the new 3/6/2023, trial date. (cc: OTCD)(Huang, H)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-02266-DAD-AC Document 157 Filed 12/21/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLEN HAMMLER, 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-2266 DAD AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER HAAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was set for trial on January 9, 2023, before the district judge. See ECF 19 No. 128. However, on December 20, 2022, the trial date was reset to March 6, 2023. See ECF 20 No. 156. All appearance writs issued for the January 2023 trial date must therefore be vacated. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following writs of habeas corpus ad 22 testificandum recently issued for plaintiff and the following inmate witnesses are VACATED: 23  Robert Santoro, CDCR # T-40346 (ECF No. 142); 24  Dannell Richard, CDCR # K-00572 (ECF No. 143); 25  Kenneth Patterson, CDCR #AB-6602 (ECF No. 144); 26  Cedrick Johnson, CDCR # G-41474 (ECF No. 147); 27  Allen Hammler, CDCR # F-73072 (ECF No. 148), and 28  Larry Alford, CDCR # AU-8727 (ECF No. 149). 1 Case 2:15-cv-02266-DAD-AC Document 157 Filed 12/21/22 Page 2 of 2 1 New appearance writs for plaintiff and all inmate witnesses will be reissued closer to the 2 new March 6, 2023, trial date. 3 DATED: December 21, 2022 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?