Hammler v. Haas, et al.
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/18/18 DENYING 58 Motion to file a sur-reply. Plaintiffs proposed surreply, 59 , will not be considered in assessing the merits of defendants pending motion for summaryjudgment. Plaintiff shall refrain from filing any further matters in this action until further notice of the court.. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALLEN HAMMLER,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-2266 JAM AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
HAAS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff’s motion to file a surreply, ECF No. 58, is DENIED, for the reasons set forth in
18
the undersigned’s order filed July 10, 2018. See ECF No. 57. Plaintiff’s proposed surreply, ECF
19
No. 59, will not be considered in assessing the merits of defendant’s pending motion for summary
20
judgment. Plaintiff shall refrain from filing any further matters in this action until further notice
21
of the court.
22
SO ORDERED.
23
DATED: July 18, 2018
24
25
26
27
28
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
