Hammler v. Haas, et al.

Filing 80

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/17/19 AFFIRMING the magistrate judge's Order 77 and DENYING 79 Motion for Reconsideration. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

ALLEN HAMMLER,

7

No. 2:15-cv-2266 JAM AC P

Plaintiff,

8

v.

9

ORDER

HAAS, et al.,

10

Defendants.

11
On April 11, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s

12
13

order filed March 28, 2019, which denied plaintiff’s motion for this court’s intervention under the

14

All Writs Act. See ECF Nos. 76-7, 79. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s

15

orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the

16

entire file, the court finds that the magistrate judge’s ruling was neither clearly erroneous nor

17

contrary to law.

18

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED upon reconsideration, that:

19

1. The order of the magistrate judge filed March 28, 2019, ECF No. 77, is affirmed; and

20

2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 79, is denied.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED:  April 17, 2019 

John A. Mendez__________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE